In Reply to: Arch to Ucla next year? posted by ClockBlocker on October 28, 2026 at 14:12:36
He probably would be a upgrade over who we have or who we could bring in, but I don't want the circus surrounding the 'anointed one' and all that Manning scrutiny. That'll be too much of a distraction and sort of disrupt the 'faceless blue collar' ethos of this team.
And...I really think Manning is error prone and only thrives in a situation where he is surrounded by superior talent and even at Texas, where he is afforded that advantage, he's somewhat disappointing. At least guys like Caleb Williams and all those Alabama QBs thrived surrounded by superior talent and led their teams to greater success than Arch.
Just my opinion. People may have differing opinions and I would like to hear what you have to say about Arch at UCLA.