Bad political reporting


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]

Posted by mh on August 12, 2026 at 09:58:18

In Reply to: There is no vaccine for stupidity posted by mh on August 12, 2026 at 09:43:26

"David Crowley pulled off a victory in Wisconsin’s Democratic primary for governor on Tuesday that was both a stunning upset and an unheard of comeback, defeating the field’s frontrunner with a Hail Mary effort in the final weeks of a race that was seen as a test of whether new democratic socialist victories in deep blue states could be replicated in Midwestern battlegrounds."
---
Lazy reporters draw conclusions to fit a pre-conceived narrative.

Hong was a bad democratic socialst candidate. She had more baggage than a fully-loaded 747, and still lost by a tiny margin. Wisconsin voters rejected Hong, not liberal ideas.
---
"Crowley defeated Francesca Hong by less than half of a percentage point in an election outcome that none of the statewide polls predicted. In every survey, including one Crowley’s campaign paid for, Hong carried a double-digit lead in the race."
---
Primary polls are notorious for being incredibly inaccurate. They typically are off by an average of 13%. Those polls showed a race within the margin of error.

But political reporter talk about those polls as facts, when they don't mean squat.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Email:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]