Re: UCLA in contact with 6'11 Xavier Booker

In Reply to: UCLA in contact with 6'11 Xavier Booker posted by BruinOC_2004 on April 02, 2025 at 19:07:30

Between Booker and Jamerson, I'd think Booker would be the better pick for the Bruins. He's bigger, heavier and has been under a hall of fame coach in a very tough conference for 2 years. He hasn't hit his full potential yet but there is a lot of physical presence there at 6'11, 240 lbs. Plus he would be going into his Jr year next season. Wonder if he is the starter type or the backup.

Jamerson looks to be like a physical twin of Kyle that didn't get much time with the Bruins so elected to look for greener pastures. Jamerson does have a nice looking jump shot that Kyle didn't have though. I assume he is also a backup candidate.

Follow Ups:

• Well, we have them both now, so moot UCLABB 16:38:51 04/04/25 (0)
• I am backing off on Booker--added digging tells me that traprh 10:43:21 04/03/25 (1)
  • if a kid can't cut it as a post for Izzo, he's unlikely to fit barrya 11:44:51 04/03/25 (0)
• You could be right but these posts scare me BruinOC_2004 21:35:01 04/02/25 (3)
  • It's a gamble with any of these potential backup guys traprh 07:01:10 04/03/25 (2)
    • Re: It's a gamble with any of these potential backup guys Dr.Bruin 13:00:08 04/03/25 (1)
      • Considering only the coaches, the choice would be easy :-))* traprh 13:20:08 04/03/25 (0)

Post a Followup