In Reply to: You can't sue yourself* posted by mh on May 14, 2024 at 20:58:33
Hmm, No sense of adventure buried behind your stacks of poker chips ?
No wild hair bluffs in ‘dere?
IF A LAWSUIT SOMEHOW ENJOINS, ENCUMBERS , DELAYS DELAYS DELAYS (yeah)
this implementation and baseless fine, possibly forcing at worst a substantial compromise reduction WTF is wrong with that ? i
For example, never heard heard of a Derivative Suit under the same roof, within the same corporation? Huh?
“……derivative suit is a lawsuit brought by a shareholder or group of shareholders on behalf of the corporation against the corporation's directors, officers, or other third parties who breach their duties….(fiduciary or otherwise conflicts, lack of any precedential authority ..
Since you didn’t deign to respond the first time you posted your “can’t do, “
There is EVERY reason for UCLA to sue on this flagrantly oppressive sanction
which heretofore has no precedent in any Board Of Regents past actions ..
However there are voluminous precedents for “one part of an organizaiton suing an organizaiton, must commonly shareholder derivative suits vs Board of Directors or even direct suits,
The UC System Iis actually a corporation, yes, where the Regents simulate
a Board of Directors, the university component analogous to shareholders or other similar components comprising the body of the company,
So there. But let’s say arguuendo the foregoing doesn’t fit a derivative suit cause of action..why not take a wild hair creative throw at it?
What’s the deal woth declaring some absurd “you can’t do that” when the
Regents a have already hatched an absurd”you can’t do that” puutive anamoly …perhaps a bad faith bias (because a number of them are chosen by the Governor, and they were corruptly currying his favor in his own useless overreaction to UCLA.
“Can’t Do” People …pavers on the road to failure …